Lia Purpura’s September is a piece about
the bones of a small cat—weird huh? Personally, I am fascinated how Purpura writes about death and decomposition so nonchalantly to the extent she sounds like a scientist.
However, Purpura’s use of literary style
and technique creates an interesting narrative about the matter--as if it was an
archeological fossil.
The line that I particularly enjoy in
this piece was:
The shape the body made was
placid-seeming, unlike the animals of prehistory, who, trapped in the posture
of shock, in half-light on a cave wall, are forever outrunning fire, weather,
attack. (81)
This sentence gives readers a sense of
what the author is thinking. What’s interesting is the absence of conjunctions,
which makes the sentence sound choppy; however, it also mimics the way how people
think thoughts and see things—one thing at a time. This also sets an analytic tone to the narrative.
Aside from that, the author also plants a
lot of abstract/ vague sentences such as: simple bodies are sketched in ochre
flight, red oxide smudge on a flank. These sorts of imagery are difficult to
picture without having to dissect the sentences—word for word. And I think the
author has written the narrative in a way that puts readers in the same shoes
as how she analyzes the cat’s bones.
Cool. I'd like you to say more about the creation of the analytic tone and what you think that ends up doing for Purpura as a speaker.
ReplyDeleteCheck this out and let's talk about it sometime:
http://www.creativenonfiction.org/brevity/craft/craft_minis.htm
Dave